Is Cry It Out Safe? What the Research Actually Says
Few parenting topics start fights faster than "cry it out." You'll find people online absolutely certain it's harmless, and others equally certain it's traumatic. Both camps tend to be louder on conviction than on evidence. So let's do something different here: look at what the actual research found, be honest about its limits, and leave the judgement at the door — because whether you use this method or never touch it, you can be a wonderful parent.
First, what "cry it out" even means
"Cry it out" is a loose, emotionally loaded label. Sleep researchers use more precise terms:
- Full extinction — putting a baby down awake and not returning until morning (the strict, classic "CIO"). In practice, very few families do this in its pure form.
- Graduated extinction — the far more common version: putting baby down awake and checking in at gradually lengthening intervals to reassure (and reassure yourself).
When people argue about "cry it out," they're often arguing about different things. Most modern, structured sleep approaches are graduated, not full extinction.
What the research actually found
The most-cited rigorous study here is a randomized controlled trial by Gradisar and colleagues, published in Pediatrics in 2016. It compared graduated extinction and a gentler bedtime-fading approach against a control group. Two findings matter most:
1. The structured methods improved infant sleep (faster settling, fewer wakings) compared to controls. 2. Critically, the researchers measured infant stress hormone (cortisol) levels and the parent-child attachment relationship, and found no evidence of harm to either at the 12-month follow-up. Babies in the sleep-training groups were not more stressed and were not less securely attached (Gradisar et al., 2016, Pediatrics) (Pediatrics).
That's the headline most fear-based takes leave out: in a controlled trial, structured methods did not damage the bond or chronically stress the babies. That doesn't make CIO mandatory or "best" — it makes the claim that it's inherently harmful not supported by the strongest available evidence.
It's also fair to name the limits: this is one trial, follow-up was a year, and it studied infants past the early months. It can't tell you it's right for your family. But it's a far more honest foundation than the certainty on either side of the internet.
Why age matters — and why people say "6 months"
You'll often hear that you shouldn't start any extinction-based method before around 6 months. The reasoning is sound: younger babies frequently still need night feeds, can't reliably self-settle developmentally, and their sleep is still consolidating. There's no precise universal start date, but waiting until the back half of the first year — and checking with your own pediatrician first — is the common, sensible guidance. The NHS emphasizes that infant sleep develops differently for every baby and there's no one-size schedule (NHS – Helping your baby to sleep).
Always confirm with your pediatrician that your baby is gaining weight well and no longer medically needs overnight feeds before nightweaning or using an extinction method.
How to do it more gently, if you choose to
If you decide a structured method fits your family, graduated check-ins tend to feel more manageable than full extinction:
- Put your baby down drowsy but awake — the AAP recommends this so babies learn to fall asleep in their own sleep space (HealthyChildren.org – AAP).
- Check in at intervals (say, brief reassurance, then gradually longer waits), keeping check-ins calm and short.
- Stay consistent for a couple of weeks — inconsistency is what tends to make it harder and longer.
And if you read all this and think not for us — that's a completely legitimate decision. There are gentler, no-cry-led routes (bedtime fading, the chair method, pick-up/put-down) that also have a place.
A grounding note on sleep needs
For context: the American Academy of Sleep Medicine puts infants 4–12 months at about 12–16 hours of sleep per 24 hours and toddlers at 11–14 hours (AASM sleep duration consensus). Any method is in service of helping a baby get enough rest — not a test of parenting worth.
A note on this guide: This is general educational information reviewed against the Gradisar 2016 Pediatrics trial, AAP and AASM guidance — not medical advice. Talk to your pediatrician before starting any sleep-training method, especially regarding your baby's age and night feeding needs.
---
If you choose a structured method, tracking settling times and wakings night-by-night shows you within days whether it's working — which can save you from second-guessing a method that just needs a few more consistent nights. Wermom makes that log effortless. [See how Wermom works →]
Get the Wermom app — freeFrequently asked questions
Does cry it out cause lasting harm or damage attachment?
The strongest controlled study (Gradisar 2016) found no harm to attachment or to infant stress hormones at follow-up. It's one trial with limits, but it does not support the claim that structured methods are inherently damaging.
At what age is cry it out considered safe to try?
Many providers suggest waiting until around 6 months, once a baby can developmentally self-settle and no longer medically needs night feeds. There's no exact universal date — confirm with your own pediatrician.
Is graduated extinction the same as cry it out?
Not quite. Graduated extinction includes regular calm check-ins, while full extinction does not. Most families who "do CIO" are actually using the gentler graduated version.